Court pot outcome on Ayesha Gulalai’s disqualification
Ayesha Gulalai. PHOTO: File
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) indifferent a settlement on Friday on a petition seeking a disqualification of MNA Ayesha Gulalai as a lawmaker.
Justice Amir Farooq of a IHC listened a case, wherein a petitioner submitted that Gulalai had leveled groundless allegations of nuisance opposite Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) arch Imran Khan though presenting any justification and breached open trust on a building of a National Assembly.
He serve submitted that a MNA had lied about initiating authorised record opposite a PTI chief.
PTI womanlike members face consistent nuisance within party: Ayesha Gulalai
The postulant asked a justice to invalidate Gulalai for violating the Representation of People Act 1976.
The justice asked a counterclaim warn if a box was a private matter in inlet or not. Later, a justice indifferent is preference in a case.
On Aug 1, Gulalai had indicted a PTI arch and his ‘gang’ of promulgation licentious content messages to women workers, saying they were constantly tormented within a party.
According to a discontented lawmaker, victims of nuisance in Pakistan were not listened to unless they dedicate self-murder or take a similar inauspicious step to get themselves noticed.
The PTI arch had discharged a allegations and created a minute to a National Assembly orator seeking a stop of Gulalai’s council membership.
No concede on ‘character’, Gulalai tells lawmakers
A duplicate of a minute was also submitted to a Election Commission of Pakistan.
In a letter, the PTI arch had requested a orator and a arch choosing commissioner to take movement opposite Gulalai, an MNA from South Waziristan inaugurated on a indifferent chair for women, underneath Article 63-A (2) of a Constitution.
Khan, in his letter, submitted that in defilement of rules, Gulalai did not opinion for Sheikh Rashid, a party’s claimant for a chair of a primary minister.
He combined that a PTI had released a uncover means notices to Gulalai though she had not responded to them. Therefore, he contended, movement should be taken opposite Gulalai Article 63-A (2) of a Constitution for not following a party’s directives.
Article source: https://tribune.com.pk/story/1513433/court-reserves-verdict-ayesha-gulalais-disqualification/