CJP takes suo motu notice of marriage halls during PU
LAHORE: Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Mian Saqib Nisar took on Monday suo motu notice of construction of marriage halls within a closeness of a University of Punjab.
The tip decider has sought a respond over a construction work from Lahore Development Authority.
“On what basement have blurb engagements been authorised to lift out within a closeness of a varsity,” Chief Justice Nisar questioned.
CJP Nisar also incited a petition of a citizen over a emanate into suo motu notice.
On Apr 21, a send of University of Punjab land to a provincial supervision was dangling after Supreme Court’s Lahore Registry took movement opposite it.
A two-member dais of a peak court, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Saqib Nisar, also summoned some-more sum regarding to a emanate from a Punjab government.
Transfer of Punjab university land to govt suspended
Court also summoned members of syndicate, that was obliged for offered a university land to govt
During suo motu conference on bootleg appointments of vice-chancellors, a justice systematic a Punjab supervision to immediately designate a new vice-chancellor for Punjab university.
The provincial supervision asked a justice for some-more time regarding to a continual appointment of a new vice-chancellor.
Earlier in a day, a Supreme Court’s Lahore Registry had systematic a cessation of University of Punjab vice-chancellor Dr Zakaria Zakar.
The justice also systematic that university’s senior-most highbrow should be allocated to offer as halt vice-chancellor.
The justice also summoned a members of a associate that was obliged for offered a land. Later, a associate members had dangling their preference to send university land to a government.
While addressing a syndicate, a tip decider had remarked: “On whose management did a associate ask a university for a land?” The justice has been sensitive that a land was allotted for a construction of a Orange Line Metro Train (OLMT) project, he added.
Chief Justice Nisar also questioned because hasn’t a continual vice-chancellor been allocated during a university in a final 2.5 years. “Please surprise us who is obliged for this,” he remarked.