The questions are: How did a Prime Minister’s children emanate their companies? Is Maryam Nawaz dependant on someone? And did a primary apportion tell a law in his statements?
PM s counsel had pronounced in justice on Tuesday that Maryam Nawaz is not contingent of PM given 1992. But in 2011 papers Maryam Nawaz was mentioned by PM as he bought skill on her name.
Justice Asif Saeed Khosa asked that where did that income come from, with that London flats were bought? There were accusations that PM Nawaz Sharif gave that money. There are also allegations that there are contradictions in PM s statements.
PM s family has to give proofs as Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf s (PTI) counsel Naeem Bukhari has presented his arguments.
Article source: http://www.suchtv.pk/pakistan/general/item/46683-pm-s-lawyer-to-give-answers-today-in-panama-leaks-case.html