Row intensifies: Power method accuses NEPRA of being inequitable opposite consumers
PHOTO: FILE
ISLAMABAD: A yank of fight between a Ministry of Water and Power and a National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) has strong as a former snubs a regulator over what it says is a inequitable opinion in foster of K-Electric and giving it a purify minute after collection of Rs62 billion due to extreme tariff.
In a minute sent to a Nepra chairman, a energy method argued that it was awaiting a regulator to residence a identified inaccuracies and deficiencies in a arriving tariff determination.
NEPRA dismisses explain of additional Rs62b collection in Karachi
However, surprisingly, a regulator’s initial greeting was to transparent K-Electric, negating a possess anticipating of 2014 that a energy application was overbilling a consumers in Karachi, it said.
This is a second minute created by a ministry. In a prior association about dual weeks ago, a method had argued that K-Electric had collected billions of rupees from Karachi consumers by extreme tariff determination.
The method wrote a second minute after Nepra discharged a explain of additional Rs62-billion remuneration by K-Electric consumers and termed a ministry’s avowal an try to boar seeds of conflict in multitude and break a substructure of a association of Pakistan.
In a latest letter, a energy method pronounced Nepra did not do a regulatory responsibilities towards K-Electric consumers in 2015 and 2016 by loitering a preference on returning a extreme distinction for roughly dual years notwithstanding carrying adequate opportunities in around 8 quarterly adjustments.
“The unsuited denunciation in a communication is regretted and notwithstanding addressing a issue, Nepra has taken retreat in a inhabitant interest,” a method said, insisting that supposed seeds of conflict were sown when a regulator incited a blind eye to a seductiveness of consumers.
“National peace will, in any case, be improved served if a highlighted issues are addressed to yield prudent service to a consumers opposite a country,” it said.
Power plant: Ministry reiterates Nandipur cost-efficiency
“Had a consumers of K-Electric been treated with equity and supposing service by Nepra, some-more than 18,000 complaints would not have been filed with a sovereign ombudsman, that accounted for about 90% of a complaints opposite a energy zone opposite a country.”
Even if other costs compared with a tariff had increased, that, by any standards, was legally and financially unworthy and jagged in a tariff, it said.
“It is so transparent that an upside in tariff has been easily authorised while no regulatory shortcoming has been undertaken for a rebate in foster of consumers when due.”
If a multi-year tariff regime was performance-based, a method asked, how could K-Electric’s disaster to grasp a 15% aim for delivery and placement waste be rewarded by permitting aloft profits.
Dec 2016: NEPRA slashes energy tariff by Rs2.21 per unit
“K-Electric’s disaster to grasp opening targets should not be borne by a consumers in a arriving tariff,” it insisted.
The method blamed unsound burden of K-Electric for a catastrophic opening during a feverishness call of 2015 and 2016 and pronounced Nepra became kindly in sequence to foster investment in a alleviation of K-Electric’s system.
The method asked Nepra to say a change between a interests of consumers and K-Electric instead of permitting biased favours to companies during a responsibility of consumers.
Article source: https://tribune.com.pk/story/1321800/row-intensifies-power-ministry-accuses-nepra-biased-consumers/